Saturday, August 31, 2013

Hedging a Market Going Lower


Historically, September has been a lousy month for the stock market, and in 2013 we enter the loss month on the verge of going to war again. Here’s what happened yesterday, as reported by Yahoo:

“With the Labor Day weekend ahead and the likelihood of military action in Syria also looming.…equities fell to their lows midway through the session when Secretary of State John Kerry commented on the Syrian situation, implying the U.S. will act alone if necessary…. 

“Eight of ten sectors ended in the red with influential cyclical groups weighing on the broader market. Financials, technology, industrials, and discretionary shares lost between 0.5% and 0.7% with the discretionary sector leading to the downside. 

“Nearly all discretionary components posted losses. Home builders settled on their lows as the iShares Dow Jones US Home Construction (ITB 20.56, -0.40) fell 1.9%. Retailers also slumped as the SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT 77.88, -0.59) lost 0.8%. Big Lots (BIG 35.42, +0.78) bucked the trend among retailers, climbing 2.3%....

“Elsewhere, the industrial sector succumbed to the pressure exerted by transportation companies as the Dow Jones Transportation Average fell 1.1%.” See:

DIY portfolio managers about to duck for cover can either go to cash now (and use it for bottom fishing when the market inevitably turns positive) or boldly switch into inverse funds. 

Searching for stocks likely to gain in a down trend is a third and far more challenging alternative.

I am reluctant to recommend switching to bonds. They fall in value when interest rates rise, and bond rates are way overdue for an up trend.

Writing for ETF Trends, Gary Gordon goes beyond war fears when he says real-estate ETFs “hold the key to the U.S. stock market’s direction.” See:

Also, John Spence writes of inflows on fears market set for a fall. See:


My Fund of the Day: GRZZX


Grizzly Short (GRZZX) is a no-load mutual fund. It gained 72% in market-crash 2008, but it’s not designed for buy-and-hold investors. It’s profiled at:

My Yahoo chart for GRZZX from 2001 shows the fund’s gains in down-years 2001, 2002, and 2008 and its losses in other years.

The fund’s record of price performance from 2001 shows clearly that GRZZX can be a dangerous choice that’s not suitable for conservative or risk-averse investors. The same can be said of all inverse mutual funds and exchange-traded funds.  

For the record, ETFdb has several ETF lists, including one of inverse funds. See:

Never forget this: All investments and savings are gambles on the unknowable future and thus subject to loss as well as gain.

Do visit my website for lots more research I share with do-it-yourself portfolio managers:


Friday, August 30, 2013

Buy the Dow or the Entire Market



The Dow Jones Industrial Average (the Dow 30) is a portfolio of blue-chip stocks that ought to be of interest to buy-and-hold DIY portfolio managers who seek an easy way to build a portfolio.

I’ve used Value Line as my primary research resource from 1984 until now, primarily supplemented by American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) VectorVest. I strongly and often recommend the three.

Also, I have often recommended that DIY buy-and-hold portfolio managers consider picking and choosing among the Dow 30 stocks or even acquiring all 30—because I think it’s a good bet that the Dow 30 will edge mostly upward for as long as there’s a stock market.

And since the appearance of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in 1989, I have also recommended buying the Dow 30 in a single security, SPY—or the entire stock market by acquiring VTI


The discount broker I use, TDAmeritrade, is representative of such brokers that advertise commission-free trades for some, many, or all ETFs. See:

My Stock of the Day: VZ


Value Line’s detailed analysis of Verizon (VZ) pops up at your touch of a single key:

Touch another key and you get Value Line’s VZ profile:

My 5-year Yahoo chart for VZ shows severe ups and downs at the end of the market collapse of 2008-2009, an outstanding buying opportunity in mid-July 2010, and a jagged 45-degree up trend that only an aggressive investor could tolerate. See:

My 3-month chart’s MACD evaluation suggests VZ may now be in the early phase of a new up trend:

Never forget: All investments and savings are gambles on the unknowable future and thus subject to loss.

If you wish, tell your DIY-investor friends and relatives they ought to visit my blog posts at:

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Portfolio Analysis Resources


VectorVest and AAII are my favorite research tools for stocks and ETFs. For free, VectorVest provides an impressive written analysis of any stock even if you’re not a member:

Also free, VectorVest gives visitors the ticker symbols of its three best-performing stocks and a detailed written report on any one of the three:

And for $9.95, VectorVest provides a five-week trial that includes a free portfolio analysis:

You can Bing or Google free portfolio analysis to find more such resources.

If you wish, visit Amazon for the review of my 14th book:

http://www.amazon.com/My-America-1931-2031-Astonishing-ebook/product-reviews/B00BPD0TUM/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1



My ETF of the Day: AFOP


Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc. (AFOP) heads today’s list of VectorVest’s three strongest selections. The stock is profiled at:

My 5-year performance chart for AFOP shows steady recovery from the market collapse of 2008-2009, mostly a sideways pattern in 2011 and 2012, and a dramatic upswing in recent months. See:

My 3-month chart suggests AFOP may now be in a new up trend. See:

Never forget this: All investments and savings are gambles on the unknowable future and thus subject to loss as well as gain.

If you wish, tell your DIY-investor friends and relatives to visit my blog posts at:

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Tech May Soon Find Its Up Trend


Writing for Charles Schwab, Brad Sorensen, CFA, says he’s looking for a recovery from the technology sector’s bubble burst back in 2000, despite its dismal showing so far this week. I like the case Brad makes for tech:

“Technology stock valuations look relatively attractive right now, based on historical levels and compared to other sectors,” he writes. “The current price-to-earnings ratio of the tech sector stands at 11.7 times NTM [next twelve months], compared to its 15-year average of 23.1 times NTM. Based on this measure, technology is the cheapest sector of any in the S&P 500.” See Brad’s article in full: http://www.schwab.com/public/schwab/resource_center/investing_ideas/invest_in_the_future.html?src=qmp&sv1=s16p9am4X_dc&sv2=26265461660&sv3=xpxe4op6q0

I’ve found more insight into the tech sector in a Zacks article presented by Yahoo. See:

Let’s take a fun break now. Go to:

And if you wish, visit Amazon for the review of my 14th book:
http://www.amazon.com/My-America-1931-2031-Astonishing-ebook/product-reviews/B00BPD0TUM/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1


My Stock of the Day: GOOG


Google (GOOG) is profiled for free by Yahoo here: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=GG+Profile

And GOOG is mentioned favorably in a Zacks article presented by Yahoo, 3 Internet ETFs Leading the Tech World Higher. See:

I’ve long been a Google fan, and I own its stock. I may buy more shares when I think its 3-month chart shows an opportunity for bottom feeding.

My 5-year Yahoo chart for GOOG shows a persistent struggle to regain its previous up trend after a quick initial recovery from the market collapse of 2008-2009:

My 3-month chart suggests GOOG deserves daily attention as it struggles to find a buying opportunity leading to another extended move upward. See:

Never forget: All investments and savings are gambles on the unknowable future and thus subject to loss as well as gain.

Do visit my website for lots more research shared with do-it-yourself portfolio managers:

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Revisiting Mild-Risk Selections


A friend is in the process of closing a nine-figure deal after more than two years of negotiation. He asked me if I had a suggestion for how to invest a mild-mannered legacy portfolio for the family trust he’s now working on.

To respond, I returned to the list of stocks featured in my blogpost of one month ago, July 27.  I’d suggest all of them for a relatively low-risk, well-diversified, big-bucks legacy trust of any friend or relative.

A corporate trustee would then keep an eye on them to weed out any that appear to be going bad at any future time.

For corporate trustee, I’d probably suggest National Advisors Trust, because I was a member of its inaugural board of directors and know its employees as brilliant, well-educated, competent people of integrity. You can visit it at:

To find my list of recommended legacy stocks, I  mined them from both the AAII Model Shadow Stock Portfolio and the three leaders of AAII’s collection of 77 stock-selection strategies.

I turned first to AAII.com to see the selections for the AAII Model Shadow Stock Portfolio for good reason. As of June 30, 2013, the model’s total return for the year to date was 35.1% and its average total return for the last 10, 5, and 3 years was 22.3%, 23.2%, and 37.6%—and 63.3% for the last 12 months.

For that July 2012 blogpost, I’d mined the ticker symbols of the model portfolio’s holdings alongside those of companies not in the model but recently passing its selection criteria.

My combined list of tickers in alphabetical order:

ACY, ADUS, ADY, AIQ, ALG, AOSL, APP, ARL, CBK, CPSS, CSS, CXDC, DCO, DXYN, EAC, EBF, ECTY, MERU, FDP, FLXS, GAAS, GAI, GILT, HDNG, HMNF, HOFT, HTCH, IBCP, IFMI, IMH, INOC, ISH, JCTCF, JST, KBALB, KTCC, LIWA, MDCI, MIND, MRLN, PCCC, PCMI, RCKY, RCMT, REGI, REX, ROIAK, SALM, SCVL SGA, SKYW, SMP, SGRP, SNFCA, TA, TCI, USCR, VOXX, WLFC, XRM, XRSC, ZEUS.

AAII points out that its two model portfolios—one stocks, another funds— “are real investments with real dollars that are managed as if by an individual investor.”

For the organization’s list of benefits for members, see:

If you wish, visit Amazon for the review of my 14th book:

http://www.amazon.com/My-America-1931-2031-Astonishing-ebook/product-reviews/B00BPD0TUM/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1


My Stock of the Day: Chevron (CVX)


At 10:20 this morning my 61 legacy stocks are, like the stock market, in a tailspin, probably because of the war-or-peace situation created by the Iranian use of chemical weapons against its own people. See:

Of the 61, only these three are up at this writing: CVX, PFE, XOM.
Each of them could be up or down by the end of this trading day, this week, this month, or this year. No one can know which way, so I certainly cannot and neither can you. We can only guess, and the better guess may be to get out of the market entirely.

My 5-year Yahoo chart for Chevron (CVX)  shows a persistent up trend coming out of the 2008-2009 market collapse. See:
My 3-month chart suggests another up trend may be at hand for CVX. See:
Never forget: All investments and savings are gambles on the unknowable future and thus subject to loss.

If you wish, visit my blog posts at:


Monday, August 26, 2013

The Neo-Luddites Are Marching



It’s said that from the dawning of the industrial revolution in the 19th century, followers of Ned Ludd (Luddits) protested job-killing technological change. See:

Writing in Saturday’s New York Times (Aug. 24, 2013) David H. Autor and David Dorn assess the implications of automation. Autor and Dorn write:

“Labor-saving technological change necessarily displaces workers performing certain tasks — that’s where the gains in productivity come from — but over the long run, it generates new products and services that raise national income and increase the overall demand for labor.

“In 1900, no one could foresee that a century later health care, finance, information technology, consumer electronics, hospitality, leisure, and entertainment would employ far more workers than agriculture….

“Fast-forward to the present. The multi-trillionfold decline in the cost of computing since the 1970s has created enormous incentives for employers to substitute increasingly cheap and capable computers for expensive labor.

“These rapid advances — which confront us daily as we check in at airports, order books online, pay bills on our banks’ Web sites or consult our smart phones for driving directions — have reawakened fears that workers will be displaced by machinery. Will this time be different?”

You can find the whole article at:

Regular readers of my blogsite or my latest book know my position on the issue of future joblessness:

America ought to be bringing serioius human brainpower to work figuring out how to deal with the terrible, predictable negatives of hyper-advanced automation likely to be in place 20, 30, and 50 years from now.

None of those is a great span of time into the future to me and to those of us who were born in the 1930s or ‘40s or ‘50s and maybe even the 1960s and ‘70s. We’ve lived long enough to know present and future time seems to pass slowly and that future time passes in a rush.

I see need for educated guesswork soon (well, now) on how cheap, massively produced goods and services are to be acquired by a hoard of desperately poor, unemployable consumers.

I see need for educated guesswork soon (well, now) on what’s to become of capitalism when our 47% swells into 94%.  

I see need for educated guesswork soon (well, now) on what’s to become of life on a planet populated by desperately poor people with lots of time on their hands.

Yes, from time to time I do think back on the French and Russian revolutions.

And yes, I am looking well beyond the present transitional period (when the newly jobless are being retrained to fill the jobs created by new technology) into the time when all the information in all the world’s computers will predictably be built into super-advanced robots which will take on the design, manufacture, and delivery of ever-smarter robots.

See the New York Times piece at:

If you wish, visit Amazon for the review of my latest book:

http://www.amazon.com/My-America-1931-2031-Astonishing-ebook/product-reviews/B00BPD0TUM/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1


My Stock of the Day: OME


Through July 31, AAII’s Shadow Stock portfolio was up double-digit annualized returns over 5 years (+24.2%), 1 year (+76.6%), and YTD (44.4%). See:

The current list of six companies recently passing AAII’s selection criteria for the Shadow Stock portfolio includes Omega Protein Corp. (OME). See:

My 5-year Yahoo chart for OME shows a strong recovery from the market collapse of 2008-2009 but since then a down trend. See:

My 3-month chart suggests now is a good time to watch the progress of OME’s 20-day moving average on a daily basis to see if it provides a hint of a new up trend. See:

Moving averages, MACD, and RSI are indicators, not forecasts or promises. They confirm merely that it’s time for each of us to decide on our own whether or not to buy or sell or hedge.

Never forget: All investments and savings and life insurance are gambles on the unknowable future and thus subject to loss as well as gain. Inflation is one reason. Since 1945, it has averaged 4.1% yearly. At that rate, the dollar loses half its value (purchasing power) in about 17 years.

If you wish, visit my website for lots more research I share with do-it-yourself portfolio managers:

Sunday, August 25, 2013

My Mutual Fund of the Day: JEQAX


John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Fundamental All Cap Core (JEQAX) is a no-load hybrid fund (stocks + bonds) with a negligible 12b-1 marketing fee (0.05%). It’s up 9.76% in 2013 through the close of Aug. 23. It’s profiled at:


I can find no performance chart for JEQAX. I guess the fund is too new or too specialized for Yahoo to bother with it.

I have little use for cash-value life insurance, but some people like it and some of them own Hancock’s. If I did, I’d probably buy this add-on fund as an inflation hedge. But I don’t, so I find my inflation hedges in the stock market and among ETFs and no-load mutual funds such as VIT paired with VTMGX.

Never forget this: All investments and savings and life insurance are gambles on the unknowable future and thus subject to loss as well as gain. Inflation is one reason. Since 1945, it has averaged 4.1% yearly. At that rate, money loses half its value (purchasing power) in about 17 years.

So, all investments and savings and insurance are gambles on the unknowable future and thus subject to loss as well as gain.

If you wish, visit my website for lots more research I share with do-it-yourself portfolio managers: