I might guess that everyone on the planet knows what a no-load fund
is and why such funds exist. In a nutshell, they’re the alternative to load
mutual funds and their sales commissions—historically, as much as 8% but
commonly 5% or so.
Most mutual funds and some exchange-traded funds are
actively managed portfolios. You might do well by putting all your investment
cash into just one such fund and holding it till death (yours or the fund’s).
I’d guess many of us do-it-yourself portfolio managers prefer
to gain diversification and hope to gain profitability and safety as well as
simplicity by dividing our cash either among no-load funds or ETFs, or a mix of
both.
Past performance of any investment is not necessarily an
indicator of future performance, but past performance usually accounts for the
selection of investments for a watch list. Ask anyone who likes to bet the
horses.
One such list
at this writing shows BIPIX (+39.74%) as the three-year leader in price
performance, followed by BIPSX (+38.39%) and PETAX (+27.76%). The first two of
those three are biotech-focused and the third and fourth, PETDX (+27.74%), specialize
in real estate. So for diversification one might forget about BIPSX and PETDX and
bring in the fifth-place fund, TCPIX (+27.49%).
My calculator tells me those three chosen no-load mutual funds
averaged gains of 31.67% for the three-year period.
There’s much more to consider when investing in mutual
funds, and MSN.com
presents Morningstar’s excellent discussion of them.
Never forget: All investments and savings are gambles on the
unknown future and thus subject to loss.
No comments:
Post a Comment